- Published on
Solar facility construction milestone and payment claim review
- Authors
-
-
- Name
- Vivienne Roberts
- in/viviroberts
-
Large scale solar construction projects are typically made up of dozens of milestones, outlined in the contract, which need to be met before payments can be made to the contractor. There are normally at least three parties involved in the processing of these payment claims, and they can cumbersome things to navigate. This post looks at what the typical milestones in a solar project are and what documentation is important.
But first, a step back. To defining the milestones:
Prior to financial close (where the necessary contracts are executed, and financing is secured) there will likely be a bit of backwards and forwards on what the key project milestones will be, and how much of the overall lump sum contract price will be allocated to each. The milestone schedule, payment schedule, project programme and financial model are all built and developed in parallel, and changing one may have an impact on the others. The contractor is interested in making sure that they have healthy cashflow throughout the project. Procurement activities in particular require a heavy outlay of cash, so they will want to get paid for completed procurement works, which typically take place towards the front end of the programme. The owner, and lenders, will want to make sure that they are receiving value for these payments, so they will be interested in making sure that the payment amount is fair, given what works have been completed.
Some of the typical milestones (and therefore payment triggers) include the following:
Notice to proceed
This is a mobilisation payment, often made to the contractor upon the award of the contract. For instance 10% of the contract price. The evidence required from the contractor is typically a letter from the owner to the contractor confirming that they have permission to go ahead with the works under the contract and that any conditions precedent to them starting works have been met, or waived as required. It may be accompanied by other documentation showing that the contractor has done all the necessary preparation works, such as securing insurance, accessing bank guarantees, appointing certain key personnel etc. The level of complexity in assessing this milestone is very much dependent on the contract requirements, but it should not be overly complicated.
Equipment procurement
This shows that the contractor has place the orders for the equipment. The evidence for these type of milestones is typically in an executed (and often redacted) contract with the equipment supplier. Additional requirements may include the supplier’s quality management plan, factory acceptance test schedule, delivery plan, and transportation, storage and handling, and installation and operations & maintenance guidelines. Reviewers should be checking that the specifications of what has been procured matches the contract employer’s requirements. The product warranties should also match the contract. Delivery schedules should be in line with the project schedule. Key components and equipment in a solar facility included as milestones are typically PV modules, structures/trackers and inverters.
Equipment delivery
This is to demonstrate that the equipment procured has been successfully delivered. These milestones should be accompanied by a lot of documentation. This can be one of the most onerous milestone types and it’s very important that the contractor has good controls in place to make this easy to review. For each equipment type, there should be a summary report which links actual equipment to containers or batches. For instance, PV modules will likely be manufactured in batches. Each PV module has a serial number, and these serial numbers are grouped together into pallets. Which are grouped together into containers, which are grouped together into batches. Which cumulatively make up the entire facility.
There should be documentation and reporting which allows someone to trace each module from the manufacturing line all the way to its delivery to site. A summary report should be maintained, identifying the position of each container (ex-works, on a ship, at port, on site etc) and a reviewer should be able to identify which containers have been delivered to site. This summary report should be supported by a myriad of documentation, including packing lists, waybills/bills of lading, serial number lists and delivery notes. In addition, there should be factory acceptance test reports and any independent factory inspection reports provided, and any applicable certificates from the manufacturer. The reviewer’s role here is not to go through everything in minute detail, but to carry out spot checks to verify that the contractor’s report is accurate, and that they are implementing proper logistical and document control throughout the whole process. Site inspections are then often carried out to verify that the equipment is being delivered in good order and that the contractor is complying with the handling and storage guidelines. It can be a big job, and messy and confusing paperwork makes it a whole lot bigger.
Construction completion
There are a lot of construction activities that can be considered for payment milestones: mobilisation to site, the completion of the boundary fence, access roads, O&M buildings and substations. But it’s typically the repetitive activities that get most of the attention, which in the case of solar are largely piling, tracker installation, module installation and inverter (or MV power station) installation.
What’s important here is what is understood by both parties to be a completed construction activity? On any project there will be some punch list activities that need to be closed out, but what is considered to be reasonable? Does everyone agree? For electrical equipment, is it enough that the unit is physically in place or should it be connected, with cables plugged in?
How is the facility divided up into sections? Is a milestone linked to an individual section of the facility? Or can the contractor claim for a percentage of works completed, regardless of where the works are taking place. Keep in mind that the first wave of construction activities can be fairly quick to do, but coming back and resolving quality issues, and closing off punch list items can take longer.
Quality documentation is the most important here, and what is inlcuded in the overall payment claim should match the contractor’s progress report, which, in turn, should align with the quality documentation. Inspection and test plans (ITPs) should be followed, and there should be inspection and test checks that are provided. Observations during walkarounds on site should align with the contractor’s quality documentation.
Mechanical Completion is often a key construction milestone. For this, all construction activities should be completed, quality documentation should be available, the punchlist should be manageable, and not affect the facility’s performance or safety, the facility should be ready for commissioning, and all the little construction activities that may not have been included as individual milestones (such as the security system) should be in and ready to be commissioned.
Commissioning
Commissioning milestones may be separated into cold commissioning (commissioning activities that can be carried out before the facility is connected to the grid) and hot commissioning (after grid connection). It is common that the owner, owner’s representative, independent or lender’s engineer may witness selected commissioning activities, to confirm that the data provided match the observations on site, and to verify that the contractor is following the commissioning plan. But commissioning milestones are often overshadowed or substituted for major completion milestones, such as practical completion or even commercial operation. These major milestones are influenced and informed by performance tests and grid compliance tests.
A portion of the contract price, such as 5%, is normally held for these milestones, and the contractor needs to demonstrate the facility’s performance and compliance with the network service provider/regulator/purchaser’s requirements. The nature of tests to be conducted and paperwork to be provided is determined by the local regulatory requirements.
They will also need to show that the facility is able to perform, by applying the performance ratio (or equivalent) tests outlined in the contract. Performance data should be provided for review, along with the application of calculations as defined in the contract, and any underperformance may be subject to performance liquidated damages.
I have worked on projects with nearly one hundred milestones, and others with only a few dozen. What matters most is whether they are clearly defined, and whether the parties have agreed upfront what constitutes the completion of an activity and what information and documentation is required. I couldn’t overstate the importance of having a session or two right at the beginning of the construction phase to clarify expectations as early as possible.